Why not have it in both places? On the tobacco you say we can't, that we have to have this exclusion of tobacco because there's another act. We can't do this because it's under CEPA. We can't do this because it's under chemical management.
If we really care about consumer product safety, wouldn't we want all of these legislative pieces to be in sync and sending the same message? That is, that certain substances are harmful and Canadians should not be exposed to them. If government's not going to do it, then we should at least give the people the information so they can make the choices.