I'd be happy, through the clerk, to provide that. There are different sectors. There's a pesticide sector. There's one around transportation, consumer chemicals and workplace chemicals. But I'd be happy to provide that through the clerk.
We do, as a country, have a plan for labelling. Again, not trying to solve everything with this one, we are already committed, and there is international commitment to do that. That would simplify things for industry as well.
With respect to simply saying something is a carcinogen, people talk about IARC as a good example. Sand is on that list. Coffee is on that list. Alcohol is on that list.
I go back to what I said earlier. With the technology today, if you ask me to look for it, we can find it. The risk comes from whether or not it comes out of the consumer product. Are humans exposed to it, and at what level, along with all of the exposures they might have, such that this creates an unacceptable risk? That's the approach we are taking with this.
To simply say, “Well, it's on a list and shouldn't belong in a product”, quite frankly, we'll find it at the nanoparticle level there anyway, in all probability, given the amount that is in the globe already. At a practical level, it's the amount that's there and the potential for that to come out of this product that creates the risk of harm.