I can track down for you some of the research that has been done on Proposition 65. Proposition 65 was introduced in 1987, so this act has a long history. It has been around a long time. It hasn't been without controversy. It's fair to say that certain elements of the industry are not wild about it.
But I think it's been a very sensible approach, and it's been a very popular approach, because many of the chemicals that they deal with are problematic and they recognize that programs.... Your colleague mentioned the chemicals management plan, which we've been strongly supportive of and which is a good way to deal with priority chemicals that require in-depth assessment and a regulatory approach. The problem is that it only can deal with about 65 chemicals a year, and even then, it takes about five years to regulate those chemicals.
This is a much more proactive way of alerting consumers and giving them a choice around products that contain harmful chemicals, as a baseline, as a default. It's not to the exclusion of programs like the chemicals management plan, but it certainly would augment those programs and provide a much more proactive way to do it, with much more information provided to the consumer.