Thanks very much.
Thanks to you all. It's always such a pleasure having such pros appearing before us who already have the amendments written, so we can't thank you enough.
I want to follow up a little bit on what Aaron was saying in terms of what it takes to be green, green labelling. In terms of banning labelling, all of those things, and in terms of what we want consumers to know, I wonder whether you think there should be something in the bill that actually bears a proper green light, a “This is okay” kind of labelling that allows people to very quickly go to the shelf and pick what's safe.
Is that what you were referring to, Aaron, that is in California and Europe? And that would need a committee that would decide what is allowed to carry this green light kind of thing.
We've talked about bringing traffic light symbols in for food--stuff that's good, stuff that's bad, stuff that's debatable. Is there a way we could move to something simpler, like to what Claire has seen on her eraser board stuff? Do we have good evidence that if two or three things come together, it could be that two and two makes five in terms of the way it affects the body? Do we have a process for saying, if you have this and this and this, it goes tilt in the body, as opposed to simply listing all the mean and nasty things that are in it?