I was just wondering about the clerk's opinion. Through you, is he saying that he sees “including motions” as being redundant? Is that what you feel?
On February 5th, 2009. See this statement in context.
On February 5th, 2009. See this statement in context.
February 5th, 2009 / 4:15 p.m.
Conservative
Colin Carrie Conservative Oshawa, ON
I was just wondering about the clerk's opinion. Through you, is he saying that he sees “including motions” as being redundant? Is that what you feel?
See context to find out what was said next.