It seems like the example of toys is a good example of where it actually would be helpful for parents to know what the product can do that might be harmful as opposed to assuming that if something is bought then it has to be safe. For me, that did bring up some of the comments Ms. Coombs made about labelling.
Ms. Coombs, one of your two proposals is around hoaxes. I am just not familiar with the issue. Can you give me some examples of hoaxes that the amendments to the bill would prevent?