I'm not quite as optimistic about this legislation as you are, Geneviève. I know that there are recalls when a product is dangerous. But how you get to that point is left up in the air in this legislation. There is no onus on the government to disclose information. So until you actually have an accident or a death, which calls for a recall, all kinds of serious preliminary situations can develop. I'm not sure it goes far enough.
I'd like to ask Don some more about the whole question of inspection capabilities. If you want to have a precautionary approach, you have to have an active presence in the field. We don't have, as they have in the United States, any kind of third-party inspection of products before they come into this country.
We have only 40 inspectors now. The budget promised by the government might double this over five years, but this whole legislation requires a much more active approach. There is nothing in here that requires importers to be subject to safety testing. There's really nothing that requires an active inspection at the border. Is that not a problem from the point of view of protecting consumers and providing all the information necessary for us to be safe?