Thank you very much.
I think that speaks for itself. It's a good amendment that we should think about.
I'd like to go to Shannon and really get at this whole issue of right to know, labelling or not, and how to deal with the concerns people have about substances that are carcinogenic; I want to take on Joe a bit on this one.
CCCR deals with very specific poisonous substances, right? It doesn't deal with chronic issues around phthalates, lead, and bisphenol A in products that could, on a cumulative basis, be problematic. If you say no labelling, then how are people going to know what they're being exposed to, and how can they act responsibly?
What you seemed to say was, “If they're bad, let's ban them”. I think that's not a bad idea, but I don't think we're going to convince the government to ban all lead, all bisphenol A, and all phthalates in all children's toys and products.
Isn't labelling the only thing left to us?