There are a lot of questions. I'll try my very best to answer.
Proposition 65 doesn't require labelling the presence; you're only labelling at a meaningful level. When our companies are marketing products they normally market on a North American basis. However, if there is a precautionary labelling that needs to be on a certain type of product, it meets and exceeds the Canadian standard, absolutely. There are different products manufactured in this jurisdiction.
One of the reasons we have been supportive of GHS is that from a company perspective, because GHS is a program that's designed for workplace chemicals as well as consumer and transportation, it would be good to facilitate trade to have a GHS type of system. However, unless the U.S. is going to move with us, there is very little benefit to us because we have a comprehensive labelling system in place in Canada currently.
With respect to the cost you mentioned earlier, we do have some cost with respect to how GHS was implemented just for soaps and detergents in the EU. The cost was 400 million euros to implement GHS just for soaps.