I'll tie that in.
What we're saying is that consumers have a right to know. They have a right to the appropriate information on labels.
We have precautionary labelling in this country. We've had it for 40 years. All I'm saying is that if we're going to move to a different type of hazard classification or labelling system in this country, we need to look at something that provides meaningful information to consumers.
I don't think putting a “C”, for example, on a sunscreen that contains titanium oxide--it is a listed IARC carcinogen and is contained in the sunscreen, but when formulated appropriately protects you from cancer--is appropriate.
I don't think having moms make their own risk assessment at the store is appropriate. I'm a mom myself, and I don't think it's appropriate to make moms ask, “Do I put sunscreen on my child or do I not?” If the product is formulated appropriately and labelled appropriately, then it is safe for consumers to use. If there's something in the product that's not safe, the government has the ability, through the general prohibition, to remove this.
With respect to lead, I think it's—