All right, thank you.
Mr. Schwarcz, I have a question for you. I was listening very carefully to what you were saying, and I was trying to sort it all out. From my point of view, you were saying—and please correct me, if I'm wrong—that there were labels put on things when perhaps there wasn't the proper science done to prove that there is a carcinogen in the product that would cause cancer or harm somebody. Is that right?
And you said these labels should not be put on, because there could be mass confusion, because things can become too labelled and you cry wolf too often, and people don't pay attention. Is that correct?