Well, I have a question for you. If doctors and scientists know there is a population that is getting cancer at an increased rate, and there's one variable in place and it is that certain products have been imposed upon that population over time, then even though scientists may have tested it in rats but haven't tested it in humans, why do you think it isn't it better to make sure that there's a precaution? We're talking about a life and death situation with people. Could I have your opinion on that point?
On May 28th, 2009. See this statement in context.