Thank you very much, Madam Chair.
When I was reading it, “no manufacturer or importer shall manufacture, import, advertise or sell a consumer product that”, and the way it's written now, “is a danger to human health or safety”, and how it's changed, it adds, “is a danger to human health or safety”, and then goes into “either from direct exposure to the product”, and it goes on.
For me, it almost sounds as if by doing that you're watering down the definition of danger. From my reading, it would be better to keep it just the straight line, “is a danger to human health or safety”. That way you're not.... You could say, “either from direct or indirect exposure to the product, or from the exposure to a harmful substance released from the product into the environment”, or where it is. Do you know what I mean? What if somebody ingests it? It could be in the body or something.
I know the intent here is to be more specific, but I think maybe it would be better to just leave it general. It would cover more, wouldn't it?