The general prohibition is very broad and would allow us to move quickly, with respect to the previous commenter's comments. And the definition on page 3 does speak to...so chronic is covered in the act in terms of the definitions as it has been laid out. So again it comes back to whether we are duplicating CEPA, and is that beneficial or not? For you as officials, does that create confusion, and is it not beneficial?
The other concern we would have with this is in respect of how we would enforce this, given the implications of some of the things that are implied with this.