Thank you, Madam Chair, for the member's question.
With all respect to industry members, who I'm sure will be writing or testifying after me, this is an interesting area in which to regulate and legislate. It's rather a game of leapfrog. We will design legislation and regulation, they will comply with it, and then, as with any other business—this is not meant to be a criticism—they will look at how they can leverage it and find opportunities within it and see what new markets it opens up for them.
What we have intended with the creation of the schedules is flexibility that would allow us over time to respond to the constant back and forth of regular business cycles that occur in this—and, quite frankly, any other—marketplace and any other industry. Rather than enshrine it in the legislation, this provides us the flexibility, as we see new product innovations, to say that they are appropriate and to allow them, or maybe to say that there are issues associated with them that need to be dealt with and add them to the schedule, for the reasons we've enunciated earlier. It provides for a significantly more flexible, nimble process to deal with the types of innovations we've seen.
Maybe it wasn't entirely clear in some of my opening remarks, but these are new product categories. These were rounding errors a few years ago, and there are now 405 million units a year.