Yes, I agree with your assessment. It's very clear that we need a sustainable, reliable, and affordable--I think “affordable“ is a key word--source of technetium for the future. Reactors, as you said, break down, and that's the reason why Canada built two MAPLEs and not one MAPLE. In the mid and long term, we have to look at that.
In terms of PETs, I said, and I'm assuming that Mr. Trost will remember, I've been practising in Canada for six years--I practised before in Europe and in the United States--and I've never seen so many advanced cancers as in Canada, and the reason is because PET has not been available in Canada, so it's a drama. As I said before, let's take advantage of this crisis to bring the health care system in Canada into the 21st century, and PET is a good way to go.