We'll get him back on Wednesday.
I guess, Dr. Griffiths, because you're the regulator you probably can't answer the question on vaccine injury compensation. Maybe Mr. Lucas or Rob could. I know Quebec had a vaccine injury compensation package, as does the U.S. A lot of people feel that if the compensation package is still with regular tort law and the burden of proof is on the victim, they have to go to court and do all of that, and it just isn't as effective as what I think Ms. Fletcher was describing as a no-fault approach.
Is there a reason why the government didn't go straight to no-fault and has done this middle ground that worries people even more?