There is absolutely no point in looking backwards. The point is to look forward to how we as a committee operate in this emergency crisis of H1N1 and whether we are doing our job. That's how we will be judged. Were there witnesses we should have called? Are there people who have insights that can help guide the committee, such as international witnesses?
I am concerned that we need the flexibility to do our job, which the Parliament of Canada gave us, in terms of oversight of the H1N1 outbreak. We had asked for a special committee. That was denied. It was determined that the health committee would be the place where the oversight would take place. We have an obligation to do our job looking forward. That's what we're saying. We cannot do that if it is just a weekly briefing, and I don't believe we agreed to just a weekly briefing. I believe that in all the language, we left the door open to call other witnesses when necessary. Even if the language was tighter than that, I do not believe the people of Canada would think we were doing our job by having just a briefing--