I was listening with interest to the debate. I wasn't happy to hear a scolding of anyone on the Liberal side about changing calendars, actually. I remember several times arguing for maintaining a calendar that we had all agreed on, in the face of forceful arguments to insert hearings on things like salt that were not part of the H1N1 month of October. I think that was out of bounds, that scolding.
I would like to make my observation that Dr. Bennett is responding constructively, I think, to what she perceives has been an unanticipated impediment to having full briefings that I know we all want. We can use those constructively to avert problems with H1N1. As we ask questions, they actually do have a benefit in terms of our government's awareness of what might not work.
I wanted to respond to Dr. Carrie's comments, which I thought were completely inappropriate since it's that side that has done some of the rearranging of the schedule. And I think that on our side we're commonly reminding the committee of decisions made about the food policy study, the healthy food study, and the health human resources study and resisting the insertion of new ideas and new requests.