Very much so.
There isn't going to be a grand-slam, home-run solution to this. There's going to be multiple 25-cent solutions to enable us to have a proper management for medical isotope and health care accessibility in Canada from the nuclear medicine perspective.
It's going to be important, from an Ontario perspective, to put in a plan that is tried and true and relatively accepted. This is a good thing to do for medical isotope production, something along the lines of Europe, where they're moving forward with a reactor-based program.
I do agree that technetium is going to be around for decades, because PET imaging and the other types simply cannot be replaced in a cost-effective way such as we have now, but you also have to have a more balanced approach. We don't want to put all of our eggs in one basket, so I believe we need to have a tried and true technique, possibly reactor-based. We also have to support new and innovative approaches to medical isotope supply as well, but don't put those new and innovative sources as the main crux of what we're doing now. We need that balance. We need to be able to use existing medical isotopes in a more efficient manner as well, because costs will go up. Hence, we need modernized equipment on the ground.