I appreciate that you've responded to the Auditor General's comments, which I thought were very tactful, considering the gap between how indicators could help us improve our health care delivery and what I thought this delivered in terms of usable information. The Auditor General's talk, in terms of delivery, page 8 or 9--no documentation to give you the guidance as to what to do, not clear what the report's trying to do, doesn't tell a performance story, has not improved over time. The recommendation is that Health Canada should review its role and approach to health indicator reporting. That's relatively pointed.
Do you believe, Ms. Dodds, that your 2008 report is a substantive change in approach, or is it an incremental improvement on what was in the 2006 report?