Exactly. I think most concerns do come from the risk group 2 labs, the labs that work with the slightly less pathogenic organisms, and for that we're trying to be less stringent in terms of requirements. For example, we don't want to require security clearance for people working with risk group 2 pathogens. The inventorying of those labs will be less stringent. We just need to know they are not possessing risk group 3 and 4 pathogens, inadvertently or otherwise, and need a higher safety level for their work.
Mostly it is really to promote our safety guidance across the board in the whole country, so there is no two-tier system like we have now, where those who import are regulated and those who don't import but acquire the pathogens domestically are not regulated.
Really the biosafety piece is not addressed in the provincial legislation. Inspections will be required of laboratories in risk groups 3 and 4, and that is generally not part of provincial legislations either. As for level 2 risk groups, we are not asking for regular inspections of those labs either. If an incident occurs in a level 2 lab, we may need to then inspect them or do some spot checks every so often. But again, we focus on risk groups 3 and 4. All those risk group 3 and 4 labs already import pathogens, which means they should already be compliant.