Do you think it's an overreaction or a way to create the facade of reacting to bioterrorist threats in the wake of 9/11, as opposed to a real solution? Some of the witnesses we've had have suggested that the real dangers, in fact, are these pathogens and toxins yet to be developed and that we don't even know what's out there and what could be done.
Given the fact that at the same time we're cutting back on research that might get us the answers to some of those questions, I'm just wondering if that's why. Or am I extrapolating too much here?