Thank you.
To Ms. Pieterson, given your comment that there should be more studies--which is not the same as what you said in your briefing, that this has been thoroughly evaluated and Health Canada does not support the notion that there are hazards posed--it sounds like Health Canada might in fact be open to relooking at the evidence and the studies.
What would it take for Health Canada to do a longitudinal study that goes right down to the postal code to identify if there is any correspondence between problems and locations that are close to the EMF sources?