I am not aware; certainly we used a range of international expertise.
Again, this is a critique of a study. This is not another study. This is not another assessment. We and the Gates Foundation are satisfied that we have enough information to make the decision.
In terms of the applicants themselves, none of them met the bar. There were deficiencies in all of them. I obviously can't go into details for matters of confidentiality, but the point is that we had a transparent process. We used outside expertise, we used expertise in the government, and we used the Gates Foundation and others.
That's the nature of scientific application. I have had proposals that I've worked on extensively that were very costly and they were not funded. That's the nature of the business.