But new evidence has come forward, and so now it's important that we ask the questions about whether or not you're prepared to review that evidence and then reconsider the process.
First of all, I do want to say that the Oliver Wyman study said at the outset, as Kirsty mentioned earlier, that it was not a complete study, that in fact--quoting from it--based on the scope of choices agreed upon at the beginning of the project, there are “limitations” to this study that would require additional research.
It's a very important statement in the scheme of things, especially now that we have very clear research, scientific evidence, from Dr. Gerson. This is an expert in the field from whom your government has sought advice in the past. Dr. Gerson is seen as someone very important in the field, who has now confirmed what the Wyman study said at the outset, that it was not complete and there are serious problems with it--