I would characterize the feedback generally as quite positive in the context, for example, of the general prohibition. The requirements that we are placing are requirements that already exist in large part. They are things that industry is aware of because of the results of decisions, for example, in liability cases that have been before the courts.
As I've said, we have an industry in Canada that largely values its reputation, wants to ensure it's providing safe products. The general prohibition really codifies those requirements and makes it transparent. It helps to build a level playing field.
In many respects, the provisions that we have in this legislation are already in place in other jurisdictions as well. So given the global nature of the marketplace, we have companies in Canada who are already subject to mandatory reporting provisions, for example, in the United States. So for many of the players in industry, they are familiar with the kinds of provisions, and if not the specific provision, they're already working to ensure they have safe products, and they appreciate the level playing ground.