I would say that given how it's subsequently defined in some of the policy elaboration we're doing, including through the consultation we're doing on mandatory reporting, no, it's not too broad.
I think that in program delivery we are always going to have a responsibility to provide precision, to be transparent to our regulatees, to provide the policy elaboration. But it does give the scope within, for example, reasonable and foreseeable use.
You mentioned you have a three-year-old daughter. We have toy experts whose life is literally to try to look at toys through the eyes of children and imagine all the various ways they can get at them, pull them apart, and make something that wasn't previously a problem into a problem.
So in terms of trying to anticipate the unexpected, as you say, we do need some latitude. And we get a lot of advice from legal colleagues on this. We have to provide the precision to give transparency so that regulatees know what it is we expect.