Exactly. There are a couple of elements. The first thing is—we didn't raise this, and it didn't come up in any of the questions—that we have new requirements in Bill C-36 that don't currently exist under the Hazardous Products Act. These relate to false and misleading claims relating to certification or health and safety claims. If it is indicated that something meets standards of CSA, the Canadian Standards Association for electrical safety...those types of things would be prohibited. So there are some new labelling and misleading and false claim requirements under the bill.
Speaking specifically to what we would do if we got that complaint, clearly we would need to identify whether it falls within the scope of the act. Clearly in this case, a frying pan does; it is an unregulated product. If it contained a substance of concern and we did a risk assessment and determined that there was an exposure to that substance and that therefore potentially it created a danger to human health or safety, we would have the ability.
It's an interesting example, because it's an unregulated product. Currently, under the HPA it would be very similar and analogous to the cadmium example we've used. Going forward, under Bill C-36, if there is a substance of concern that is found in the consumer product and there is exposure to that substance, then we would have the ability and the authority to take action.
The exposure is critical, because you could have a substance in a product that isn't accessible: there is no exposure; it isn't available. And it's only through that exposure that there actually could be a health concern.