In my opening remarks, I commented on the BioInitiative Report. It's Health Canada's position, as well as that of most international and other jurisdictional health agencies like Health Canada, that the BioInitiative Report was not peer-reviewed, although I heard Dr. Blank said a later version was peer-reviewed, and there were a lot of...that it has a lack of balance within it. They didn't present all of the new scientific evidence. They only considered more of the negative outcome reports rather than looking at all of them. It's most usual when you review science that you consider the whole scope of science showing one thing and the other thing, not just one thing--and that there were inconsistencies within the report.
It's Health Canada's position as well--as I said--as that of other international regulators that we do not support the findings.