So based on that, would it not make sense that if long-term studies are recommended with regard to children...? Why isn't the precautionary principle being used to offer protection for children and to stop people pointing to the code as a means of deferring the concerns of people like Mr. Palmer here today, and Monsieur Therrien, whom we heard from in April?
I just want to throw that in here, because we know there are pesticides out there that Health Canada still recommends as safe to use, yet we have provinces and communities that won't allow them. We have to look at the mercury poisoning and the level that Canada safety says it is, and yet we are still seeing low levels of mercury affecting and actually poisoning people, so why wouldn't we use the precautionary principle on this?