Well, there you go. I didn't remember that.
So all three of us were there.
It was an interesting meeting. To my knowledge, the media was not there.
I do not know what it cost. We did not in advance of the event say it was an important event and we should allocate a certain percentage of the budget, and after the fact, I still don't know what it cost, and so I can't answer the question about value for money.
It was an interesting conference to me, as a researcher. I certainly think there are very important questions that need to be thought about and addressed, but I think the most critical and interesting question is how do you think about something like international travel in a context where people might be pursuing that to avoid legislative constraints. That is an interesting and important question. It may be that we decide there is nothing you can do, but it may be that we decide, as in other areas—for example, child pornography—we don't care that it's illegal in Canada and not illegal somewhere else. We actually choose to pay attention to that. So all I'm saying is that, to me, there was an interesting question. The one question that I thought was most interesting got set aside on the grounds that we would deal with matters of health and safety, and I don't know that there has been enough follow-up to make that useful at this point in time.
In terms of the budget, I have no idea what it cost.