I think that was certainly described as an issue once it had reached the Supreme Court of Canada, but I think it's important to appreciate that this challenge started very shortly after the legislation was written.
In case you don't know, I was the person contracted to write the ethics expert opinion for the federal government in that case, and there was certainly no impact in principle on the ability of Health Canada to write regulations and move them forward in those initial days.
The reality is that the legislation was passed in 2004. In order for that piece of legislation to become functional, it needed a bunch of regulations to be passed. Only one regulation--consent to use--has been passed today. It is true that because of there not being other regulations, it's not an operational piece of legislation. I think that's very distressful, but that is a function of many complicated issues, not merely the fact that it's currently sitting before the Supreme Court of Canada. There was a lot of time before it was before the Supreme Court of Canada.