We started conversations back in the spring, which were initiated by a board member indicating that we hadn't kept our commitment in terms of transparency relative to providing those who are interested in our activities with a reporting of what we were doing as a board. This went on for a period of time. Perhaps by way of an excuse, but not a good one, there had been no requests come into the board for that kind of information.
However, the discussions started, and a couple of things we did. We made a decision that we would be more transparent. Secondly, we looked at comparable agencies and what they did with their board minutes to get a standard that we could look to and try to meet that standard. And we did that.
We tie that in to a new website that obviously is better than our old website. We decided to marry up the two and to introduce our reporting on previous meetings at the time we introduced the new website. And that has occurred. We looked at the standard for other organizations, and it is posting highlights.
I've already, in answer to another question, indicated the difficulty of simply giving you minutes on the website. They would be heavily redacted, because they would have to eliminate four specific categories of privileged information that we receive every meeting.