With the new legislation, we will have a suite of new tools that we don't currently have with the Hazardous Products Act. They include mandatory recall, which we don't currently have. They include the ability for us to demand tests and studies from industry at the highest levels of trade. We will have a general prohibition that states that industry cannot sell products that pose a hazard. For me, personally, the element that I think holds the most possibility in this context is mandatory reporting of incidents related to consumer products. That will give us intelligence about issues, injuries, and incidents that are happening with products early--soon--before we start to see a larger number of such incidents. And it will give us the information we need to respond quickly.
We are currently working on the implementation plan for the legislation. One of the things we have to consider is the balance between what the general prohibition can do and the extent to which we will continue to generate--and we do generate very vigorously--new regulations and prohibitions. The consideration there is that consumer products is an area where there is rapid change and where we see, frequently, an emerging hazard that sometimes in your wildest imagination you couldn't have anticipated. That's the beauty, in my view, of the general prohibition, and that will be where we put a lot of our work.
But we still plan to develop regulations. We've just yesterday done a first tranche of regulations for lead, and that's part of a four-phase lead reduction strategy.