My name is Rebecca Nesdale-Tucker and I'm with ThinkFirst Canada.
I would very much echo what my colleagues have said at the table.
Number one is that we'd like to see strategic action. It has worked on the international scene in other countries. It simply makes sense to figure out what the priorities are and focus our attention there collaboratively.
As Alison said, whatever we're approaching we want to have a three-Es perspective, so consider the education, the enforcement, and the engineering. Absolutely, we want helmets whenever your head is vulnerable. Whether it's sports and recreation, if you're on wheeled activity, have a helmet on. Have enforcement of appropriate rules across injury cause, and make sure the engineering is appropriate as well. That goes to product safety and to regulation.
Almost every type of child injury requires this kind of multi-faceted approach. We have the solutions; we simply need to implement them.
Similarly with road safety crashes, we want kids in the appropriate child restraints, in the car seat, in the booster seat. We want to lower speeds. That helps pedestrians, helps all different types of vulnerable road users. Then again, the education piece: educate adults, but I also think we first favour educating kids from a young age so they're self--