I have just a couple of quick comments.
In the U.K., they also did a trial on a voluntary basis--it was a voluntary but official program; it is different from what we have here. The experiences from both the consumer and the restaurant side were very positive in terms of the consumers' response, and the restaurants found that it wasn't as burdensome or as costly as they had feared.
The other point is that from all of the studies that I have looked at, they suggest that once you introduce nutrition disclosure, it generally is revenue neutral. Even though it does tend to shift people's preferences, choosing one product over another, it doesn't overall result in a loss of revenue for the food outlets.