Thank you for the question.
Canada has taken the whole envelope of AIDS-related research and accepted it in the broadest context: supporting research at the discovery level, as Dr. Cameron mentioned; supporting palliative research for people affected by AIDS; supporting the development of antivirals, so that their condition can be ameliorated; and, in conjunction with universities within the country and outside of the country, supporting investigations that try to get at the root cause of HIV infections. A lot of that is resident in Africa. That's its origin. Some of the discussions we've been having about how to properly tailor clinical trials and so forth does require Canada to expend some of its money, hopefully in conjunction with the Gates Foundation and others outside of the country, because that's where the advances for vaccines and the trialling are going to be done.
This is, I guess, somewhat personal--subjective, at least. As a scientist, I know that Canada has a very high reputation globally in the work it has done and the moneys it is expending, both from a research and science perspective, as well as, really, in how it's dealing with AIDS on a more personal or patient level.