You talked about health promotion. I think Ms. Grantham said that only 0.9% of investment by the three levels of government went to health promotion.
Are you proposing another percentage? Does that exist? We have talked about reallocating funding within the budgetary envelope. We have to start with the chicken or the egg. We do more prevention. So that will eventually have to extend to primary care.
Is there an ideal percentage? You mentioned an extra 5%. What shape would that take? Are you basing that on something? People always make things seem easy. We still need a model. What should be eliminated and where should the funding be reallocated to? Can the federal government show leadership with 5%, even if I am in favour of that? Where should it come from?