Yes, sure.
I echo ThinkFirst's information. It's taking what is most effectively proven by evidence. In terms of best practices, it's not a one-size-fits-all. A good example is the helmet. A helmet on a head is a protective piece of safety equipment for someone on a bike or in a sport. For someone on a playground, it actually is a strangulation hazard. So we can't say that a helmet is a protective piece of equipment that you need to wear every day, all the time. We're not asking for measures that are outside the realm of what the evidence shows.
Also, as we learn more about diseases and about what causes different diseases, we adjust the treatment. The same is true in prevention. There were things we didn't know years ago. We didn't used to wear seat belts, for instance. Now we do.
All of the children who engaged in all of the things we did as children and who were injured or killed aren't here to tell those stories. It's all of us who did actually come through it okay who can say, “Oh, we used to do that as kids, and we were fine.” Well, we were fine, but a lot of children weren't. Now that we know the interventions that work, we can implement them. I think that is what has to be the focus.
The other focus is preventing serious injuries. It's not the bumps and bruises of regular play and life but the serious, life-altering injuries that we want to really pay attention to.