Yes, I can talk on behalf of our partners in London, Ontario, because that's who we have heard from. Definitely one of the major complaints was that very often their funding would be for specific programs and would last for maybe a year or two; then the funding would be gone, regardless of whether the program was successful or not.
Definitely, there has to be some sort of structural change in the way successful or good programs are funded; oherwise, you create a hope, because something is being done at the community level, and then you take that hope by taking that programming away. It's not only the fact that it is not creating a positive trend at the community level, but also it's disappointing for our partners, who think they are being deprived of those things that were given to them before. Probably some sort of continuation in funding would be much better.