Thank you, Madam Chair.
Thank you to the minister and to the officials for appearing before the committee.
Given the issues raised by my colleagues, such as the drug shortage, which we discussed with the minister during her previous visit, and the well-known issues of salt reduction and the regulation of energy drinks, I have a great deal of trouble believing that public health is a priority with this Conservative government.
This government has always been clear: it has asked the various federal departments and organizations to prepare budget reduction scenarios of 5% and 10%. Each one of you has received various scenarios prepared by the government, and you are only waiting for the March 29 budget to know the extent to which your budgets and employees are going to be affected.
This committee has repeatedly heard testimony on health promotion and disease prevention, as well as the crucial role of the Public Health Agency of Canada in the prevention of several diseases and conditions, and I am concerned about possible cuts in your budget, Madam Minister.
In her testimony before our committee, Ms. Elmslie, from the agency, in fact referred to an excellent investment. She spoke about the Aboriginal Head Start in Urban and Northern Communities program, a program that seems primordial when we know to what extent aboriginal people are affected—more than the Canadian average—by chronic diseases.
Can you guarantee to the committee that the Public Health Agency of Canada will not have to truncate its programs after the tabling of the budget on March 29? Failing that, can you guarantee that it will be able to fulfil its mandate? The committee has heard several witnesses testify on the importance of prevention and the role the agency should play in that regard.