Yes, absolutely. I think we've made the point fairly clearly that what we are looking for is to be considered no different from any other emergency health provider. The reason we're here at the federal level as opposed to the provincial level is that if we go out tomorrow and convince all of our provincial health ministers that firefighters are emergency health providers, and then six months from now a new guideline comes out for a new pandemic and we're listed differently, we're going to have the same confusion. Different public health officers might be in place, or whatever.
Again, if the epidemiology of a virus states that only children are at risk of getting it, then I'm quite certain that the medical people who determine who gets the first priority are going to recognize that within the way they roll it out to all emergency health providers. It doesn't make any sense to me that you would look at a robust firefighter and say that he doesn't need it because he's strong or robust but that this strong, robust emergency physician needs it. That's a factor; it's separate from the occupation. We all deliver emergency medical response; we're all emergency medical responders.
You've hit the nail on the head: that's what we're looking for, the recognition that this is what firefighters do.