I agree with you very much. One of my colleagues talked about practical research versus theoretical research.
One of the things I've been involved with, coming from Oshawa, is the automotive sector. What that industry seems to do is that it will address a problem by talking to academia and seeing if it can come up with a solution, and because it does that, we've heard about problems with funding, innovation, and venture capital. If science is actually gearing toward solving a specific problem that industry has today, I think that's a good way to stimulate more research and more innovation and, at the end of the day, commercialize and actually end up with a product.
We heard from one witness. Ravi mentioned he thinks it should be 80% one way but only 20% practical research. What do you think, Dr. Cutler? Is that a good percentage that the federal government should be looking at?