That's a dangerous thing. I would hate to think that the research budget has x number of dollars in it, and so to solve the problem we're going to take all the money from the basic science people and whip it over to the applied people. The end result is that we'll just gut basic science, and we've already said that basic science is particularly strong. I don't really think that a massive reallocation of existing funds is going to solve a problem. It's going to create new ones.
We keep saying how we have very good research, and we do, and I think we should keep doing the research we're doing. We do that right. The problem is in its translation into products. Ultimately, it would be nice to somehow establish an environment in which the people at universities who want to do this could do it, but I don't want CIHR to turn into a drug company. That's not its role.