Yes. In our surveillance work, that's exactly what we're doing. We're identifying where the gaps in data are and how we can do a better job of filling those gaps.
For instance, in the context of our aboriginal populations, we are in a partnership with the Métis Nation of Canada to help them develop their own surveillance system so that the data they gather can serve their own local needs. We see this as a model for other types of surveillance.
I could talk about this for hours; maybe you and I should go for a coffee.
Oftentimes we gather all of this data and then it can't be used at the local level to make real change. We've turned that around with the work we're doing, particularly with the Métis Nation of Canada, to say “Okay, we want to facilitate you in developing what you need so you can use it to make change and transform your local situation”.
I'm really excited about that, because I think when we have that in place it's going to be a model for how we do surveillance in other areas as well.
I'm sorry that I can't tell you that we have good data right now, but we don't.