That's an excellent question. We could spend an hour talking about it, but I think long-term care is a critically important and growing sector where there are many opportunities to align funding with the objectives you want to achieve.
For example, there are initiatives occurring in Ontario and Alberta to line up the funding for long-term care homes based on the acuity, the clinical complexity, and the physical needs of the patients in the long-term care residential home sectors. I think these are important steps in sort of a case-mixed-based funding or activity-based funding for other sectors.
However, there are also opportunities for integrating quality measures because the standardized data collection is already occurring. So for example, if some of these long-term patients are cycling in and out of the hospital because they're not receiving adequate wound care or physiotherapy while in the long-term sector, those should be important indicators that there are problems of quality there and potentially provide opportunity to align the funding of these institutions or facilities with what you want to achieve, whether it's functional independence or quality of life as high as possible for some of these patients. So, absolutely, yes.