I'd like to reinforce what Peter said about ensuring that there's a scientific base underneath whatever application the public is choosing. For example, the Public Health Agency, of course, recommends CANRISK because we developed it and we know what science is behind it. We're not recommending other apps for just the reason Peter talked about. I think there is a lot more research to be done on what is underlying these applications that folks are using. We have to be sure that we're doing more good than harm.
On April 23rd, 2013. See this statement in context.