I don't know much from a regular choice standpoint. Again, from my experience in having worked with the private sector as well as the public sector and academics, I would say that we tend not to have a funding envelope that allows this stuff to be really hyper-innovative. Some people are developing some very good products. We've seen some examples, but they are being done by people who are very bold and very risky. It's not supported at a systemic level. I think if it were, you could get a lot more innovations out there and find those that might be the best, not just reward the people who are the gutsiest, because they will still do that.
If we had a systemic ability to support that at a research level, whether it's practice, industry, academic, whatever, we could advance things a lot faster and get to a much better panel of innovations that the regulatory bodies could look at. Right now, they're looking at a handful and I'm not sure that's healthy for everybody.