Thank you very much.
Dr. Wong-Rieger answered my question on the diversity. It's important, because I think that Canada has a huge role to play in terms of looking at transnational research. We have one major public administrator, really, to get all our data from, so the data is easy to share, unlike in the United States, which has the same diversity, but has to deal with, I don't know, 3,000 separate private insurance companies, and that makes it very difficult.
That's something that I feel. I don't know if you were looking at that within your framework, how Canada plays that kind of role, in terms of looking at the ethnic and the racial diversities, and how we can provide some transnational research for that in the international framework.
Mr. Carrie did ask the question, and it's something that we need to learn from others about how to do this. I think we used to do it well. The question is: how do you work around jurisdictional responsibilities to create something for all Canadians? If the European Union, as I asked in my question, has many autonomous nation states that they can set a framework for, why can't we in Canada learn from them? What can we learn from them? Is there going to be something we're going to try to learn from the European model of how this is done well?
Does anybody want to take that on?